Governance

Change should preserve coherence.

Ethosism needs a way to grow without turning every local interpretation, attractive phrase, or temporary experiment into doctrine. Governance keeps canon, practice, language, and local use distinct.

Open Governance Source

Authority layers

Layer 1

Canon

Source texts in books/ and the core Ethos chapters.

Layer 2

Practice

Worksheets, scripts, session formats, and applied guides.

Layer 3

Language

Ethra specs, corpus, lexicon, dictionary, style, and governance files.

Layer 4

Publication

Website, print outputs, release packets, and handoff evidence.

Layer 5

Local use

Study groups, households, facilitators, and institutions applying the material.

Change status

Label every substantive proposal.

Draft

Private or early work, not relied on publicly.

Proposed

Ready for review against canon, evidence, and practice use.

Experimental

Usable in bounded trials with clear review criteria.

Accepted

Incorporated into the relevant source of truth.

Deprecated

Retained for history but no longer recommended.

Rejected

Reviewed and declined with reasons.

Review questions

Accept only what improves use.

  1. 1. Does this make reality easier to see?
  2. 2. Does this clarify duty rather than hide it?
  3. 3. Does this reduce avoidable harm?
  4. 4. Does this improve repair when harm occurs?
  5. 5. Does this preserve memory across time?
  6. 6. Does this resist personality cults, coercion, and vague self-help drift?

Facilitator boundary

Local groups may apply Ethosism, not own it.

Facilitators may host study, practice, service, and repair sessions. They may not claim binding doctrine, require confession, sell spiritual authority, override professional care, or use the group to create dependence. Their duty is to keep interpretation text-grounded, participation non-coercive, and escalation honest when a matter exceeds the group's competence.